Address code review feedback: fix test assertions and exception handling #6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…and exception handling Co-authored-by: ochui <21917688+ochui@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Add tests to cover exception and edge cases in server routes
Address code review feedback: fix test assertions and exception handling
Jan 25, 2026
Refactors the test to use a custom async context manager that raises the lock error, providing more accurate simulation of lock acquisition failure. Removes unnecessary assertions on mock calls for clarity.
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request addresses code review feedback from PR #5 by improving test quality and maintainability. The changes focus on removing unused imports, making test assertions deterministic, and making exception handling more specific in the test suite.
Changes:
- Removed unused imports (
MagicMockand top-levelLockError) and movedLockErrorto local import where needed - Fixed non-deterministic test assertions by replacing
assertIn(status_code, [201, 400])with deterministicassertEqual(201)and added explicit response validation - Replaced overly broad exception handling (
except Exception,except:) with specificexcept asyncio.CancelledErrorin lifespan tests - Improved test isolation by properly mocking async context managers and stubbing background tasks to prevent uninitialized queue access
- Updated
test_clear_queue_malformed_jsonto send actual malformed JSON instead of mocking - Removed unused
responsevariable intest_deep_status_exception
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addresses 8 review comments on PR #5 covering unused imports, non-deterministic assertions, and overly broad exception handling in test_routes.py.
Import cleanup
MagicMockand top-levelLockErrorimportsDeterministic test assertions
test_enqueue_get_queue_length_exception: ChangedassertIn(status_code, [201, 400])to deterministicassertEqual(201)- when get_queue_length fails, enqueue proceeds with current_queue_length=0test_clear_queue_malformed_json: Now sends actual malformed JSON viaclient.request("DELETE", ...)instead of mockingException handling specificity
except Exceptionwithexcept asyncio.CancelledErrorin lifespan testsexcept:withexcept asyncio.CancelledErrorresponsevariable intest_deep_status_exceptionTest isolation improvements
test_requeue_with_lock_lock_error: Properly mocks async context manager to exercise LockError pathtest_lifespaninitializes_queue: Stubsrequeue_with_lockto prevent uninitialized queue access during startup/shutdown testing💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.